Medal of Honor Monday graphicFor a lot of military heroes, actions taken in battle are carried out without thinking, and they're sometimes hazy afterward due to the fog of war. For Army Command Sgt. Maj. Robert Martin Patterson, the actions that earned him the Medal of Honor during

Read more

AI Warplane

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. -- With the midday sun blazing, an experimental orange and white F-16[1] fighter jet launched with a familiar roar that is a hallmark of U.S. airpower. But the aerial combat that followed was unlike any other: This F-16 was controlled by artificial intelligence, not a human pilot. And riding in the front seat[2] was Air Force[3] Secretary Frank Kendall.

AI marks one of the biggest advances[4] in military aviation since the introduction of stealth in the early 1990s, and the Air Force has aggressively leaned in. Even though the technology is not fully developed, the service is planning for an AI-enabled fleet of more than 1,000 unmanned warplanes to be operating by 2028.

It was fitting that the dogfight took place at Edwards Air Force Base[5], a vast desert facility where Chuck Yeager broke the speed of sound and the military has incubated its most secret aerospace advances. Inside classified simulators and buildings with layers of shielding against surveillance, a new test-pilot generation is training AI agents to fly in war. Kendall traveled here to see AI fly in real time and make a public statement of confidence in its future role in air combat[6].

"It's a security risk not to have it. At this point, we have to have it," Kendall said in an interview with The Associated Press after he landed. The AP, along with NBC, was granted permission to witness the secret flight on the condition that it would not be reported until it was complete because of operational security concerns.

The AI-controlled F-16, called Vista, flew Kendall in lightning-fast maneuvers at more than 550 miles an hour that put pressure on his body at five times the force of gravity. It went nearly nose to nose with a second human-piloted F-16 as both aircraft raced within 1,000 feet of each other, twisting and looping to try force their opponent into vulnerable positions.

At the end of the hourlong flight, Kendall climbed out of the cockpit grinning. He said he'd seen enough during his flight that he'd trust this still-learning AI with the ability to decide whether or not to launch weapons.

There's a lot of opposition to that idea. Arms control experts and humanitarian groups are deeply concerned[7] that AI one day might be able to autonomously drop bombs that kill people without further human consultation, and they are seeking greater restrictions on its use[8].

"There are widespread and serious concerns about ceding life-and-death decisions to sensors and software," the International Committee of the Red Cross has warned. Autonomous weapons "are an immediate cause of concern and demand an urgent, international political response."

The military's shift to AI-enabled planes is driven by security, cost and strategic capability. If the U.S. and China should end up in conflict[9], for example, today's Air Force fleet of expensive, manned fighters will be vulnerable because of gains on both sides in electronic warfare, space and air defense systems. China's air force is on pace to outnumber the U.S. and it is also amassing a fleet of flying unmanned weapons.

Future war scenarios envision swarms of American unmanned aircraft providing an advance attack on enemy defenses to give the U.S. the ability to penetrate an airspace without high risk to pilot lives. But the shift is also driven by money. The Air Force is still hampered by production delays and cost overruns in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter[10], which will cost an estimated of $1.7 trillion.

Smaller and cheaper AI-controlled unmanned jets are the way ahead, Kendall said.

Vista's military operators say no other country in the world has an AI jet like it, where the software first learns on millions of data points in a simulator, then tests its conclusions during actual flights. That real-world performance data is then put back into the simulator where the AI then processes its to learn more.

China has AI, but there's no indication it has found a way to run tests outside a simulator. And, like a junior officer first learning tactics, some lessons can only be learned in the air, Vista's test pilots said.

Until you actually fly, "it's all guesswork," chief test pilot Bill Gray said. "And the longer it takes you to figure that out, the longer it takes before you have useful systems."

Vista flew its first AI-controlled dogfight in September 2023, and there have only been about two dozen similar flights since. But the programs are learning so quickly from each engagement that some AI versions getting tested on Vista are already beating human pilots in air-to-air combat.

The pilots at this base are aware that in some respects, they may be training their replacements or shaping a future construct where fewer of them are needed[11].

But they also say they would not want to be up in the sky against an adversary that has AI-controlled aircraft if the U.S. does not also have its own fleet.

"We have to keep running. And we have to run fast," Kendall said.

© Copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III, Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defense Richard Marles, Japanese Minister of Defense Kihara Minoru and Secretary of National Defense of Philippines Gilbert Teodoro conduct a multilateral press briefing at U.S. Indo-Pacific Command headquarters, Camp H.M. Smith, Hawaii.

HONOLULU -- Amid a gathering of top defense leaders from across the Pacific in Hawaii, Pentagon officials said Thursday that the U.S. not only needs to grow its ties in the region but also bolster the number of troops there to deter China.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, while standing alongside his counterparts from Australia, Japan and the Philippines, said that the four leaders "discussed how we can deepen our trilateral cooperation to strengthen stability and security."

However, one military official also said that the U.S. needs "an improved force posture and it needs to be west of the International Date Line ... so that we can have a lethal and combat credible force" closer to China, Russia and North Korea.

Read Next: Temporary Promotions for Army Noncommissioned Officers to End in June[1]

Austin's day of meetings with his counterparts in the region comes as China continues to expand its campaign of harassing and threatening nearby countries and their ships in the South China Sea.

On Tuesday, the Philippine coast guard announced that two of its ships were rammed and shot with water cannons[2] by vessels from the Chinese coast guard. The incident is just the latest in a growing number of skirmishes that are only increasing in frequency.

Defense officials at the Pentagon told reporters that incidents like this are "really worrisome operational behavior and coercion" and "a topic that we're going to focus on together."

Earlier in April, Austin assured Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. that the long-standing mutual defense treaty "extends to both countries' armed forces[3], public vessels, and aircraft -- including those of its coast guard -- anywhere in the Pacific, including the South China Sea," according to Pentagon spokesman[4] Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder.

However, Gilberto Teodoro Jr., the Philippine defense secretary, told reporters that he didn't want to discuss "a scenario when or in what occasions the [defense treaty] may be invoked,” before noting that its invocation "will be a political decision, at the end of the day."

But as incidents between China and the Philippines continue to simmer, the U.S. military official said there is a worry that there aren't enough U.S. service members in the region to respond to a possible, future incident or offer "a lethal and combat credible force forward."

The military official noted to reporters that, while the Indo-Pacific has about 300,000 assigned forces, only about 80,000 of those are west of the International Date Line, which passes through the center of the Pacific, and the bulk of those are in Japan.

However, simply moving troops into the region permanently is not on the table since there are both legal and political constraints.

In February, the Philippines agreed to increase the number of military camps[5] that the U.S. will be allowed to maintain in the country to nine. However, those are not bases with permanently stationed troops but rather locations that the U.S. military has access to should it need them.

Meanwhile, Australia recently inked a historic deal, commonly called "AUKUS," that will see the U.S. provide the island nation with its much-coveted, nuclear-powered submarine technology. However, the military official noted that "Australia's constitution prevents us basing in Australia."

The solution, officials say, is to continue to build relationships with allies and increase the tempo of exercises and troop rotations through the region.

Austin said that he and the other leaders are "looking to conduct more maritime exercises and activities among our four countries," while officials at the Pentagon said that the aim for the meetings was to generate "'no kidding' proposals for collective action."

"We need to create opportunities for training environments, for locations that they can do rotational visits to," the military official said.

Austin acknowledged that "we're clear-eyed about the challenges that exist throughout the region and so we'll need to continue to work together."

"But that's why we're here -- because we share a common vision," Austin said.

Related: Army Planning Big Boost to Pacific Operations Next Year with More Training, Deployments and Equipment[6]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[7].

Read more

Yamoca Joseph, a medical support assistant in Kenner Army Health Clinic's Wilkerson Pediatric Clinic, checks the credentials of 14-year-old Jayden Rios prior to an appointment.

Tricare[1] beneficiaries in the West Region can expect to have access to a list of network health providers before Nov. 2 and any appointments made this year for after the first of the year will be honored, according to the Defense Health Agency.

TriWest Healthcare Alliance is set to assume management of the Tricare West Region on Jan. 1, affecting roughly 4.5 million beneficiaries in 26 states, including six states currently in the East Region.

According to Defense Health Agency spokesman Peter Graves, TriWest will publish its T-5 West Region Provider Directory online sometime before Nov. 2, and beneficiaries will be able to review it to determine whether their current providers will remain in the Tricare network.

Read Next: Army Suspends Temporary Promotions, Overhauls Required Schooling for Noncommissioned Officer Promotions[2]

Graves said it's also likely that providers who have established relationships with their patients will "individually notify beneficiaries if they will remain in the Tricare network" under the next-generation contract, known as T-5.

The Defense Department awarded the new Tricare contracts to TriWest in the expanded West Region and Humana Military in the East Region in December 2022, prompting a series of bid protests[3] and a lawsuit from Health Net Federal Services[4], the company that currently manages the West Region contract.

The T-5 contracts shift six East Region states to the West Region, including Arkansas, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and Wisconsin. The contracts also promise to offer greater provider network flexibility, improved response times and transfer of specialty care referrals during a permanent change of station[5] move.

Patients have contacted Military.com with concerns over how the change will affect their medical care. Retired Navy[6] Lt. Cmdr. Jim Buehler said that he has appointments scheduled months out for cardiac care and pain management and worried whether his referrals and appointments would be honored when Wisconsin, where he lives, switches regions.

"I've reached out to Tricare East, Tricare West (both the current and future contract holder), and DHA Tricare Admin to find out. ... Nobody I have spoken with seems to be able to address my concern," Buehler wrote in an email. "The doctors I have scheduled book out 6 to 8 months and, if I need new referrals, I will most assuredly lose at least one of my appointments."

Graves said that all appointments scheduled before Dec. 31 for dates after Jan. 1 "will be honored and remain scheduled."

"For beneficiaries living in one of the states that's going from the East Region to the West Region, DHA and Tricare regional contractors have a variety of communications planned throughout the year to explain how the transition will occur and any action they need to take so their Tricare benefits continue seamlessly," Graves said.

A spokesperson for Health Net Federal Services said the company is "fully committed to providing exceptional health care" to patients through the end of the year and has a number of communications campaigns planned with beneficiaries to ensure a good transition.

"Our role and the activities involved in transitioning from T2017 to T-5 are carefully accounted for as part of contracted transition plans, and we will continue to make sure our transition-out activities run smoothly," the company said in a statement.

TriWest did not respond to a request for comment.

Graves encouraged beneficiaries to check the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System[7], or DEERS, to make sure all beneficiary information is correct.

"This will help ensure they don't miss important communications regarding their Tricare benefit," he said.

Related: Two of DoD's Biggest Military Contracts Are Now Up for Grabs[8]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[9].

Read more

More Articles …