A young Palestinian kid carries jerricans

After President Donald Trump's announcement Tuesday that he was prepared to use U.S. military forces in Gaza, the Pentagon appeared to once again be caught off guard by the change in policy, and officials were unable to offer any details or confirm any planning.

"The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it, too," Trump told reporters at a news conference Tuesday evening alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He vowed to turn the territory that two million Palestinians call home into "the Riviera of the Middle East."

Trump didn't rule out using U.S. troops to accomplish that goal when asked by reporters, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters Wednesday[1] that he was "prepared to look at all options."

Read Next: Elon Musk Aide Is Now Working at VA and Accessing Its Computer Systems[2]

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday also called Trump's plan historic, "outside-of-the-box" thinking while also not ruling out the use of U.S. troops. She said Trump had not committed to putting "boots on the ground."

Meanwhile, when several military officials within the Pentagon were asked by Military.com about any plans, they were not prepared to offer any details.

One official said they were unaware of any plans being drawn up, before adding a phrase that is so often repeated that it has become cliche within the walls of the Pentagon: "We are a planning organization, though."

Hegseth commented to reporters on Wednesday but provided no new details on any military planning for Gaza.

"The president is involved in very complex and high-level negotiations of great consequence to both the United States and the state of Israel, and we look forward to working with our allies, our counterparts, both diplomatically and militarily, to look at all options," Hegseth said.

"We certainly would not get ahead of the president or provide details about what we may or may not do," he said.

In fact, Pentagon officials have spent most of the early days of Trump's second term reacting to executive orders or policy announcements that they would learn about at the same time as the public.

The military had to scramble to push troops to the southern border[3] after Trump ordered their involvement, and officials then had no details to offer when Trump and Hegseth said military strikes inside Mexico were on the table[4].

Officials weren't ready to say how they would detain nearly 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo Bay[5] in the days after Trump said he wanted to use the remote base in Cuba for his deportation efforts. The Pentagon also had no ready plan to allow troops who were booted for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine to return to service with back pay when that order was signed.

Experts have already[6] chimed in and noted[7] that Trump's plan to forcibly remove the Palestinians in Gaza, seize control of the land and redevelop it would be a colossal logistical and financial challenge that could easily trigger a new wave of violence and conflict.

Plus, there doesn't appear to be any legal authority that would allow the U.S. to seize control of Gaza, and removing its entire population would violate international law.

Saudi Arabia[8], as well as Turkey and Egypt[9], also issued statements overnight condemning the plan.

Trump's bombshell announcement that he intends the U.S. to take control of one of the most volatile areas in the world comes after him campaigning on keeping the U.S. out of foreign wars.

The U.S. military was involved in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for two decades, efforts that included holding territory and building up local areas, similar to what the president proposed on Tuesday.

The eagerness to involve the U.S. military in Gaza is also a sharp departure from the position that many Republicans took less than a year ago when they criticized President Joe Biden's plan to use an Army[10] mobile pier system to deliver aid to the war-stricken region.

In April, as the pier was being set up, a mortar attack on the area[11] led Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the highest-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, to release a statement saying that[12], "Biden should never have put our men and women in this position, and he should abandon this project immediately before any U.S. troops are injured" and that "the risk to Americans will only intensify."

No troops were injured.

Then, after a few disappointing months of operation[13], Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., the Republican lawmaker who leads the House Armed Services Committee, wrote to the Biden administration and called for an end to the mission[14], citing among other reasons the fact that three service members were injured in the effort.

The injuries occurred at sea, because the Biden administration was firm on the fact that no U.S. troops would set foot in Gaza.

Related: First 10 Migrants Arrive at Guantanamo Bay and Will Be Held in Terrorist Prison[15]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[16].

Read more

A painting of Civil War-era soldiers.When America's favorite groundhog, Punxsutawney Phil, emerged from his cozy burrow at Gobbler's Knob, Feb. 2, 2025, he saw his shadow, and according to legend, that means we're in for six more weeks of winter. 

Many Americans associate Groundhog Day with

Read more

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda Md.

Patients at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland were referred elsewhere last month for surgeries, and another 212 have had their care deferred as a result of a failure in the facility's steam plant and flooding that ruined more than 50 rooms.

The problems at the U.S. military's flagship facility began more than two weeks ago when temperatures plummeted to the low teens in the Washington, D.C., region.

According to a Jan. 31 information paper sent to members of the media from Walter Reed, a steam leak in mid-January and issues with the medical center's aging steam plant disrupted operations at the department that sterilizes surgical equipment, forcing the facility to move 56 cases to other military hospitals and Tricare[1] network hospitals in the region.

Read Next: Mental Health Providers in Tricare East Go Unpaid After Claims Processor Switch[2]

Failure of the sterilization system also caused the facility to defer 212 procedures and rely on sterilization processes at facilities including the National Institutes of Health; Fort Belvoir[3], Virginia; and Andrews Air Force Base[4] and Fort Meade[5] in Maryland for equipment used in what continues to be a limited number of emergency procedures at Walter Reed.

The Washington Post, which first reported the problems at the medical center on Friday[6], cited sources that said while Walter Reed usually conducts about 40 surgeries a day, that number is now down to the single digits as a result.

"The primary mission of this place is to be ready to take care of people who get seriously injured supporting combat operations. ... And we cannot do that right now," the paper quoted a source as saying.

Concurrently with the steam plant failure, a sprinkler pipe burst Jan. 20 on the top floor of one of the facility's central buildings, dumping 60,000 gallons of water into five other buildings, including the installation's iconic tower, an Art Deco-style hospital designed by President Franklin Roosevelt.

The specific cause of the leak "is still unknown," but "unseasonably cold weather and the age of physical plant facilities likely contributed to the leak," according to the information paper.

The water damage affected more than 50 rooms, five elevators and 11 hallways.

In a separate statement Friday, the Defense Health Agency said the staff has been "working diligently around the clock" to address the issues, funding emergency work orders and contracts, and minimizing disruptions to patient care.

"This acute issue is being managed aggressively to ensure patient care continues to be delivered safely," officials wrote in the statement.

The installation that houses the medical center, Naval Support Activity Bethesda[7], dates to 1942, when the National Naval Medical Center began accepting patients, but many of the buildings that house medical services are new or have been renovated in the past 20 years.

In 2011, the Walter Reed Army[8] Medical Center, roughly four miles southeast of the Bethesda hospital, moved its patients to the facility, creating the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, a joint medical center that treats service members from all branches of the armed forces[9].

It was the former Walter Reed Army Medical Center that was the subject of a major scandal in 2007 over the deplorable state of housing and treatment of wounded service members from Iraq and Afghanistan.

But as recently as 2022, the current Walter Reed National Military Medical Center also drew criticism for conditions of its barracks, with junior enlisted personnel reporting that their housing had not had hot water or air conditioning for more than two years, according to Navy Times[10].

Of the recent flooding and system failures, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the situation was unacceptable.

"This is a result of deferred maintenance under the last administration," Hegseth wrote on the social media platform X Friday. "My staff is prioritizing fixing this, and under this president, our troops will only receive the best care."

The Defense Health Agency has allocated $806,000 in emergency funding to support cleanup and restoration efforts, which are ongoing. It could take up to six weeks for the hospital to return to full operations, according to the agency.

According to facility officials, retail stores and fast food restaurants along the hospital's "Main Street" have reopened for business, and surgical teams are working to "maximize the number of cases that can be done at outlying sites," including Fort Belvoir.

Repairs have been completed at one ward and in the neonatal intensive care unit, and the hospital is no longer diverting labor and delivery services.

"At no time was patient care compromised," DHA officials said in a statement.

Related: Free Surgeries and Prescriptions: White House Staff Got Access to Military Health Care Despite Being Ineligible[11]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[12].

Read more

A soldier sits and speaks at a conference table.Army Capt. Timothy Bible stared hopelessly at the beige ceiling tiles and fluorescent lights above his hospital bed at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. It was January 2010, more than a month since his leg was amputated

Read more

More Articles …