Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle dispenses flares

More than a month after announcing an indefinite bombing campaign against Houthi rebels in Yemen, the Defense Department has offered little information and the command overseeing the campaign is refusing to answer even basic questions on what U.S. forces have accomplished in the area or whether troops have been under fire or injured.

U.S. Central Command, which oversees all military operations in the Middle East, has spent the past 30 days making near-daily social media posts about its operations against the Houthis, but those posts have been little more than videos of flight operations on the aircraft carrier[1] in the region and generic statements[2] capped off with the hashtag[3] "HouthisAreTerrorists."[4]

While some level of secrecy or information delay has always been part of military operations, the shift to actively refusing to provide even the most basic details about what service members are doing in a major military operation -- the size of which has likely not been undertaken in years -- is highly unusual. It's also paired with a near-total lack of press briefings by the Pentagon's top spokesman and a growing number of reports that the mission is not accomplishing any of its broader goals.

Read Next: Top Enlisted Leader at Air Force Special Operations Command Fired, Facing Investigation[5]

Military.com asked U.S. Central Command this week to offer any details on accomplishments in the region and for basic data on its operations like number of missions flown, a summary of the ordinance dropped or targets that were hit.

In response, an official replied less than two hours later with a statement that said: "The U.S. has hit targets in Houthi-controlled parts of Yemen, destroying command and control facilities, weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapons storage locations," and it had "confirmed the death of several Houthi leader [sic]."

When asked follow-up questions on the claims or whether the combatant command was refusing to answer the questions, a different official simply re-sent the same statement minutes later and added a line: "We have nothing additional to provide at this time."

The attitude is a notable departure from the command's behavior under the Biden administration when it would regularly release updates on social media[6] for the more than 100 strikes it conducted in Yemen since October 2023. While Central Command still insisted on withholding details such as the types of ordinance that was used, the posts included lists of targets hit by specific strikes and by what platforms, when U.S. warships were targeted and what Houthi assets were destroyed.

Those updates would also note whether any U.S. personnel were injured.

The last such update was posted on Dec. 31, 2024[7].

Despite lofty promises, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's office has not been any better at offering insight into the Yemen military operation, now in its second month.

Just days before the campaign kicked off, the Pentagon's top spokesman, Sean Parnell, posted a video in which he promised[8] to offer weekly updates and "to be the most transparent DoD in American history for the warfighters and the American people."

However, Parnell has only hosted one press conference since taking the job, compared to the Trump White House and State Department that have been providing regular public press briefings for months.

In his latest video update, Parnell only offered the following statement on the fighting in the Red Sea: "It's been a bad three weeks for the Houthis and it's about to get a lot worse."

What few details that are public or that have been gleaned by journalists paint a picture of a campaign that seems to be racking up costs and expending valuable munition stocks but accomplishing little in its stated goal of reopening the Red Sea to merchant shipping.

CNN reported earlier this month that the operation's costs were nearing $1 billion[9] while having limited impact on destroying the Houthi's capabilities.

The report noted that the strikes had used hundreds of millions of dollars of munitions that included Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles, or JASSMs, and Tomahawk long-range cruise missiles and Joint Standoff Weapon[10]s, or JSOW[11]s -- GPS[12]-guided glide bombs.

Multiple outlets[13] have also reported that the Houthis have managed to down[14] several U.S. MQ-9 Reaper[15] drones, which cost about $30 million each, since the campaign began.

Meanwhile, multiple reports noted that the air attacks are unlikely to be enough[16] to defeat the Houthi rebels and may actually be emboldening them in the process[17].

Data on transits of the Suez Canal[18] and a key chokepoint in the Red Sea also show that the weekslong campaign that has cost millions has done nothing to move the needle on the volume of merchant shipping that is moving through the area.

Salvatore Mercogliano, a maritime historian and former merchant mariner, told Military.com that he doesn't see the shipping situation changing until insurance companies lower the cost of the "war risk insurance" that shipping companies have to pay to transit the area, and he's seen little change that would convince the insurance firms to substantially lower rates.

Plus, at the same time, going around Africa instead of through the Red Sea is utilizing the extra cargo space the companies now have and that's generating higher rates for them, he said.

"In a situation where insurance companies are making money for those ships transiting the Red Sea and shipping firms maintaining their profitability, there is little incentive to change the business operations," Mercogliano said.

"Plus, if the Red Sea opens, we are going to have three months of chaos in ports, on top of Trump's trade policies," he added.

Central Command chose to not answer the question of whether there were any metrics it had that showed a positive impact on re-establishing shipping traffic in the Red Sea when asked by Military.com.

In the meantime, neither U.S. Central Command nor Hegseth's office has offered any more details on what will prompt an end to operations.

During the single briefing Parnell held in late March, he told reporters that "there's going to be ... a very clear end state to this" without elaborating.

Related: The Last Houthi Attack Was Months Ago. But the US Military Has Now Launched an Open-Ended Campaign in Yemen.[19]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[20].

Read more

Medal of Honor recipient Sgt. Dakota Meyer served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 2006 to 2010, but his commitment to service extended far beyond his military tenure, reflecting a lifelong dedication to his country, community and fellow veterans.

Read more

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a meeting with El Salvador's minister of national defense, Rene Merino Monroy, at the Pentagon in Washington.

A drumbeat of suspensions of top Pentagon officials continued into a second day on Wednesday with a defense official confirming that Colin Carroll, the chief of staff to the deputy defense secretary, was suspended.

Carroll is the third top political appointee to be suspended from his job in connection with a leak probe -- apparently into a news story about a proposed top secret China briefing to Elon Musk -- that also ensnared Dan Caldwell, a top adviser to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Darin Selnick, Hegseth's deputy chief of staff.

The move has surprised and puzzled officials in the Pentagon since Caldwell and Selnick were trusted advisers who were close to Hegseth.

Read Next: The Army Is Getting Rid of Athletic Trainers[1]

Earlier Wednesday, Axios reported that both Caldwell and Selnick were being investigated[2] as part of a probe into who told The New York Times about plans for the Pentagon to provide a top-secret briefing on China to Musk, the world's richest man who has been empowered by President Donald Trump to dramatically slash and reshape the federal government.

The original news story of the planned China briefing, which was published more than a month ago[3], said that the Pentagon had scheduled a briefing for the billionaire on the U.S. military's plan for any war that might break out with China. It cited two officials as the sources for that news and two others who confirmed broader details.

Reporters asked Hegseth about the firings on Wednesday during the open portion of his meeting with El Salvador's defense minister, but they went unanswered.

Prior to coming to the Pentagon in January, Carroll worked at the defense contractor Anduril Industries, according to his LinkedIn profile[4]. He also worked at the Pentagon's Joint Artificial Intelligence Center as its chief operating officer under the Biden administration but, according to Politico[5], he was fired for creating a hostile work environment.

Meanwhile, both Caldwell and Selnick were close allies of Hegseth. Both men worked at the same nonprofit -- Concerned Veterans for America -- and Caldwell even worked there when Hegseth was running the organization.

At the Pentagon, both men were given major roles in the three months since Trump returned to office.

By late March, Caldwell was designated as Hegseth's point person for top national security officials and the vice president, according to the defense secretary's unsecured conversation in a Signal app group chat[6] with other top administration officials -- which mistakenly included the editor of The Atlantic -- about plans for military strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen.

One defense official, who was granted anonymity by Military.com to speak candidly, even described Caldwell as being like a family member to Hegseth.

Meanwhile, Selnick was one of the first Trump officials to come[7] to the Pentagon, and he took over running its personnel and readiness directorate, which fielded the slew of directives and orders to address the plans to oust transgender troops[8], offer back pay to COVID-19 vaccine refusers[9] and address standards among the force[10].

Selnick was recently promoted from that position to be Hegseth's deputy chief of staff.

Military.com reached out to both Caldwell and Selnick but did not receive any replies.

The fallout from the alleged leak investigation is not the first shake-up of staff in the top offices of the Pentagon.

Last month, Hegseth's office also sidelined another senior political appointee, John Ullyot, who had acted as the top Pentagon spokesman before Sean Parnell took over the role.

Ullyot's reassignment came after he issued an especially blistering statement defending the removal of an online article honoring trailblazing Black baseball player and Army[11] veteran Jackie Robinson.

Ullyot issued two statements on the matter in which he argued that Hegseth's staff did not view or highlight Robinson -- along with other female service members and troops with minority backgrounds who were censored from Defense Department media -- "through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or sex."

Robinson is a historic figure in baseball because he was the first Black player to play in the major leagues in the 1940s, during a time of segregation and systemic racism in the U.S.

In a video posted days after Ullyot's ousting, Parnell largely reiterated Ullyot's message[12] but admitted that "some important content was inadvertently pulled offline" and blamed artificial intelligence tools "and other software."

He also alleged that content was being both "mistakenly removed" and "maliciously removed." But the Defense Department also censored much more media on female, minority and LGBTQ+ troops that has not been restored, and has undertaken a wider campaign to ban books[13] from military libraries, including[14] the U.S. Naval Academy[15].

-- Patricia Kime contributed to this report.

Related: 'Different Spanks for Different Ranks': Hegseth's Signal Scandal Would Put Regular Troops in the Brig[16]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[17].

Read more

More Articles …