Library at Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, Belgium

A group of military and veterans’ spouses[1] is joining forces to advocate against book bans at Defense Department schools, service academies and elsewhere within the military.

While starting small -- the group has six core members -- the organization they've dubbed Military Families for Free Expression has plans for virtual events and "activations" in communities around military bases with the goal of educating other military families about the book bans and empowering them to speak out.

"I can't believe the irony is lost on anyone that our service members who protect and defend, serve the Constitution, which houses our free speech right and our access to these books and these publications, they might have that same right limited for themselves and their families," said Kelly Wilson, one of the founding members of Military Families for Free Expression and the wife of a Navy[2] veteran.

Read Next: White House Asked Joint Chiefs Chairman for Candidates to Lead NASA, Worrying Experts[3]

Since taking office in January, the Trump administration has been cracking down on anything it deems to have an undue emphasis on diversity.

At the Department of Defense Education Activity schools that serve military children and service academies that are preparing the next generation of military officers, that crackdown has largely played out by officials pulling from library shelves books that focus on minorities, women and LGBTQ+ people.

In May, the Pentagon expanded the book banning effort with a memo directing all military branches[4] to scrub their libraries of materials "promoting divisive concepts and gender ideology."

The memo also created an "Academic Libraries Committee" to review the books that are pulled from the libraries to make a final decision on what to do with the books. And it listed search words to use to find books to pull, including "affirmative action," "discrimination," "gender identity" and "white privilege."

The May memo, in particular, spurred conversations among a network of military spouses that resulted in the formation of Military Families for Free Expression, or MFFE, said Kellie Artis, another of the group's founding members.

"We started calling ourselves the anti-committee committee because the initial impetus was the May 9 memo that came out standing up the Academic Libraries Committee," Artis said. "This shouldn't be a thing, first of all. Second of all, we don't agree with this. We want to put some pressure on that."

The group publicly launched late last month with a post on the blogging website[5] Substack.

The Substack page has generated some interest from other military families who want to get involved with MFFE, but the group is expecting its bigger public launch to be a webinar it is tentatively planning for later this month, Artis said.

"Just informing people. What are we even upset about? Why is this bad?" Artis said of what the webinar will be about. "And then what people can do on a local level, whether it's with their own lawmakers or whether it's on base. Is there a structure on base where they can lodge complaints or ask questions about processes? ... Little things that you can do to inject yourself in the process, be a bit more civically engaged in that way."

After the webinar, the group is eyeing in-person events, likely near but not on military bases. Artis pointed to a Naval Academy[6] graduate who raised money to buy and distribute[7] copies of books that had been removed from academy libraries as inspiration for the type of activities MFFE could do.

Wilson, a lawyer whose professional experience includes high-profile issues such as being part of former Navy SEAL[8] Eddie Gallagher's legal team and helping draft an early version of the military family housing tenant's bill of rights, said opposing the book bans should not be a partisan issue.

"The short term is to educate people on why this is important and to get more information from people in positions of leadership that are involved in this process, because right now there's no transparency," Wilson said. "Long term would be ... to help people understand that these rights are integral to our country and who we are, and we cannot cherry-pick them in their application."

"We have to protect these rights no matter what," she said. "And I really think that we can help people understand that, regardless of what side of the political aisle you find yourself, we need to protect these rights."

MFFE is the latest way military families are pushing back on the book bans.

Students at DODEA schools have staged several walkouts in protest of the book bans[9] and other anti-diversity efforts, and a handful of families protested[10] during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's visit to a base in Germany in February.

Six military families represented by lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union also filed a lawsuit[11] against the DODEA and the Pentagon over a range of anti-diversity actions, including the book bans.

In court filings last month in response to the lawsuit, DODEA officials acknowledged that 555 books have been pulled from shelves for "further review," along with 41 classroom materials. The filing downplayed the removals, noting that they represent 0.1% of DODEA's library books and 0.01% of classroom materials.

"As ample case law shows, curating a library collection or developing a teaching curriculum is an act of government speech," Justice Department lawyers wrote in a filing last month. "It is therefore not subject to rigorous scrutiny under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. Even if that were not the case, plaintiffs cannot establish that DODEA schools' reviews were motivated by any impermissible reason other than a pedagogical concern for its schoolchildren."

At a hearing in the lawsuit last week, a federal judge ordered the government to produce a full list of all the materials removed from DODEA schools, according to an order posted to the court docket[12]. The deadline to submit the list is this week.

Meanwhile, at the Naval Academy, all but about 20 of the nearly 400 books that were removed earlier this year have been returned to shelves, officials said last month[13].

MFFE is keeping an eye on the ACLU lawsuit but does not want to do anything to get in the way of it, Artis said.

For its effort, MFFE has sought advice from some larger free speech and anti-book ban groups, including American Booksellers for Free Expression and National Coalition Against Censorship.

"I've just tried to give them some sense of what the national landscape is like in terms of book bans, so that can mean what's happening in school districts, but also what's happening legislatively," said Philomena Polefrone, associate director of American Bookseller for Free Expression. "I think this group can do some really important work in raising awareness and just getting back to common sense curation practices in libraries."

Lee Rowland, executive director of the National Coalition Against Censorship, similarly commended MFFE for "upholding the best of American traditions" and "the full essence of the Constitution."

"Book bans are pernicious wherever they happen, but there is a particularly insidious aspect to banning words and ideas in an institution that is designed to defend American values," Rowland said. "Because at the core of those values is the Constitution, the First Amendment and a commitment against censorship and for liberty. And book bans undermine all of those values. And while they're always bad, it does feel particularly pernicious and dangerous in a military context."

Related: Pentagon Committee Created to Direct Book Banning in Service Branches[14]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[15].

Read more

Army soldiers line up during Exercise Beyond the Horizon 2016 Guatemala

The deadline for transgender service members on active duty to voluntarily leave the military arrived Friday, setting the stage for the Pentagon to soon begin kicking out those troops.

For the transgender service members faced with the decision to leave or be booted later, Friday -- which also marks the first full weekend of Pride Month when many cities around the country, including Washington, D.C., will be holding parades and festivals celebrating LGBTQ+ rights -- was an agonizing day.

One of the service members who has decided to leave is Maj. Erica Vandal, a West Point[1] graduate and field artillery officer who was raised in a military family. While Vandal said she "absolutely" wants to continue serving, she had to consider her ability to support her wife and their two children.

Read Next: Army Ends Most Barracks Maintenance at Fort Cavazos Amid Federal Cuts[2]

"Honestly, I feel a lot of guilt regarding my decision," Vandal said in a phone interview Friday. "I have no doubt that is what is best for me and my family, just in our circumstances right now. It is the best decision when weighed against this carrot-and-stick policy that we are currently up against. That being said, I have that kind of guilt that I'm almost taking a step back from this fight contrary to how I was raised by my father and everything that the Army[3] has taught me over the past 14 years."

Friday's deadline for active-duty troops was set in a May memo the Pentagon issued after a Supreme Court ruling allowed the department to enforce a ban on transgender troops while lawsuits against the ban are still under consideration by lower courts.

Transgender members of the reserve and National Guard[4] have until July 7 to voluntarily separate.

The Pentagon had originally set a March deadline for transgender troops to voluntarily leave, but that deadline was forestalled by court rulings before the Supreme Court stepped in.

The department previously said[5] about 1,000 troops requested to voluntarily separate in March, though it has declined to provide a more specific number.

The Pentagon's latest ban on transgender troops is the result of an executive order President Donald Trump signed during his second week in office in January that contended being transgender is "not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member."

Under the policy the Pentagon issued in February to implement Trump's order and reaffirmed in the May memo, troops with a history of gender dysphoria, who "exhibit symptoms" of gender dysphoria, or who have transitioned to their gender identity are now disqualified from service.

Defense officials said in May[6] they will rely on annual health screenings and recommendations from commanders in identifying troops to kick out.

But before that, the department has been trying to entice transgender troops to leave of their own accord by offering financial incentives.

The service members who elected voluntary separation by Friday are eligible for twice the amount of separation pay[7] they would get if they are later involuntarily discharged from the military.

Involuntary separation pay is typically 10% of a service member's annual base pay multiplied by their years of service. Many transgender troops have been serving for a decade or more, so doubled separation pay could easily top $300,000.

The Navy[8] also said this week that it was expanding[9] eligibility for early retirement for transgender troops who voluntarily separate. Under the new criteria, transgender sailors with at least 15 years of service can request early retirement, unlocking significantly more benefits than they would otherwise get for leaving with fewer than 20 years of service.

The Air Force[10] and Army are also allowing transgender troops with at least 15 years of service to request early retirement if they voluntarily separate.

Despite wanting to continue to serve, the separation pay and stability of leaving on her own terms swayed Vandal's decision.

"If I was only worried about myself, there's not a doubt in my mind that I would be fighting this tooth and nail, that this would be the hill I would plant my flag on and would die on if necessary," Vandal said. "However, with the family considerations, I think it drastically changes the kind of math involved with that."

The transgender ban is being challenged by two lawsuits, meaning it could still be blocked by the courts in the coming months.

Vandal is a plaintiff in one of the lawsuits and, despite separating, plans to stay a plaintiff with hopes of one day being reinstated.

"This voluntary separation was a coerced separation, voluntary in name only," she said. "Even after everything, I love this country, I love the Army, I love the military, and I'm proud of my service and would like to continue to serve."

The lawsuits have slowed down considerably since the Supreme Court ruling.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is weighing one of the lawsuit's requests for an injunction against the policy, issued a notice this week saying oral arguments about the injunction could be held in October.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is weighing the other lawsuit's injunction request, has given no indication of when it might issue a decision since it heard oral arguments in April.

Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights and one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs in the D.C. lawsuit, said the delay since the April arguments is unusually long but speculated the D.C. Circuit is overwhelmed with challenges to Trump administration policies.

Whatever the appeals court decides on the injunction, and even as the ban begins to be implemented, Minter vowed to keep fighting.

"The government itself does not claim -- I mean, they couldn't. There would be nothing to support this -- but they don't claim that any of these service members have done anything wrong. They're simply kicking them out because they're transgender," Minter said. "One hundred percent we're not going to stop fighting."

Related: Pentagon Will Use Health Screenings, Commanders to Ferret Out Trans Troops for Separations[11]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[12].

Read more

More Articles …